Shaping the right climate reporting regulation hasn’t been easy on businesses, but it has been highly effective at bringing the impact of climate to the board table.
As organisations reflect on the latest changes in New Zealand1 and the mandatory rules of disclosure that fall away, we see an opportunity for businesses to rebalance the value equation in favour of reporting that truly matters to them and their investors. They are no longer thinking only of compliance, and instead, are freed to focus on reporting for value.
Whether affected by these changes or not many organisations are asking, what next? With significant time and resources invested in reporting, how can they ensure they continue to gain value from their efforts?
Regulatory change prompts a moment for businesses to take stock, assess progress, and make strategic choices which better fit their needs.
For companies that are no longer part of the regime and were preparing to report Scope 3 emissions and climate-related financial impacts in 2026, a pause in data gathering or reporting may be tempting – but the consequences are often underestimated when businesses want to reignite reporting practices. It can make financial sense to stay the course for a number of reasons:
Finding the right balance is key.
Using the additional regulatory relief means businesses can progress voluntarily and at a pace that works for them. A proportionate approach that maintains the core benefits of reporting with appropriate levels of investment is likely to result in fewer remediation surprises and less disruption in the long term.
Those not captured by regulation may still find value in exploring where climate information could support decision-making and steer business operations aligned with their definition of value. More broadly, all organisations – whether currently, previously, or never captured by regulation – are increasingly looking beyond climate topics to consider how wider sustainability information can support strategy, performance and long-term value creation.
In response to regulation companies have developed new systems and processes to better understand how climate impacts their operations. They can now use that information to mitigate risk and uncover opportunities that protect and grow business value.
Alongside this they have developed external reporting capability that expresses that value outside of the business, translating internal insights into information that stakeholders can understand, trust, and act on. This is the sweet spot where the value in climate reporting lies.
PwC’s Global Sustainability Reporting Survey 2025 found that most companies are seeing value from sustainability reporting that is above and beyond compliance. In fact, 70% of respondents cite that the data and insights are of moderate to significant value to their company. These insights remain highly relevant to New Zealand businesses, even as domestic requirements change.
Q: Beyond meeting compliance requirements, how much value do you think your company has obtained from the data and insights collected for CSRD/ISSB Reporting.
The survey gathers responses from 496 executives and senior professionals at companies reporting, or preparing to report, under CSRD or ISSB requirements. It highlights how companies are translating reporting efforts into broader business value. More information on the survey methodology and participants can be found in the linked article.
Climate, and broader sustainability reporting have the potential to deliver value beyond regulatory compliance.
Each company must explore what reporting activities, data points and analysis enable better business outcomes, and minimise what detracts.
In New Zealand, all companies are able to voluntarily report additional climate and sustainability information, whether they are subject to regulatory requirements or not. Reporting on a voluntary basis gives organisations the opportunity to take a more selective and proportionate approach to suit individual business needs, while also anticipating future stakeholder or regulatory expectations.
It's an approach we are seeing globally too. Among companies affected by the CSRD 'Omnibus' delay1 and threshold changes, around half (51%) still plan to report on the same timeline but in a way that suits them. Some will continue with the CSRD (27%), others will use another framework (13%) or will report without aligning to a specific framework (11%).
Voluntary reporting sits outside of a regulatory regime so it will be important to maintain confidence in the information that is shared. For some organisations, this may mean identifying information where independent assurance could add value, particularly where decisions, investment, or stakeholder trust depend on it.
It is our view that the trajectory for climate reporting in NZ businesses remains compelling: climate reporting is so much broader than compliance and the value case exists for businesses to produce information that supports strategy and strengthens decision making.
What comes next won’t look the same for everyone.
We trust the reduction in regulation will help some businesses, that are struggling to balance the value equation, land an approach that feels workable for the business and that reflects its definition of value.
Climate, and broader sustainability reporting has evolved quickly, and in moving from the abstract to the practical, has become a value-adding tool for many New Zealand businesses. Staying engaged and invested in reporting, at a proportionate level, will leave businesses better placed to protect, and even increase, corporate value through climate change.
AI, climate change and geopolitical shifts are reconfiguring the global economy. Read our global thought leadership that maps where value is moving over in the next decade.
Get the latest insights, news, and publications covering multidisciplinary sectors, industries, and economic developments that help shape the business landscape in New Zealand.